[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151124082757.GB23624@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:27:57 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arch: consolidate CONFIG_STRICT_DEVM in
lib/Kconfig.debug
* Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> * Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Let all the archs that implement CONFIG_STRICT_DEVM use a common
> >>> definition in lib/Kconfig.debug.
> >>
> >> For the x86 bit:
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> >>
> >>> Note, the 'depends on !SPARC' is due to sparc not implementing
> >>> devmem_is_allowed().
> >>
> >> Maybe that should be converted into a helper Kconfig switch for architectures to
> >> opt in to /dev/mem restrictions?
> >
> > Sure, easy enough to add a ARCH_HAS_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED opt-in.
>
> Is there some hidden meaning about the difference between ARCH_HAS_...
> and HAVE_ARCH_... and HAVE_... ?
There's also the double underscore variants such as __HAVE_ARCH_STRNCASECMP! ;-)
It's all just nonsensical historic muck: because no-one ever was confronted with
the messy global picture.
Today you can run Documentation/features/list-arch.sh and wonder at the zoo of
options ;-)
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists