[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1511241219430.28883@nippy.intranet>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 12:21:18 +1100 (AEDT)
From: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
To: Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>
cc: Sam Creasey <sammy@...my.net>,
Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...il.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...n.com>,
linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/71] More fixes, cleanup and modernization for NCR5380
drivers
On Mon, 23 Nov 2015, Ondrej Zary wrote:
>
> PDMA seems to be broken in multiple ways. NCR5380_pread cannot process
> less than 128 bytes. In fact, 53C400 datasheet says that it's HW
> limitation: non-modulo-128-byte transfers should use PIO.
>
> Adding
> transfersize = round_down(transfersize, 128);
> to generic_NCR5380_dma_xfer_len() improves the situation a bit.
>
> After modprobe, some small reads (8, 4, 24 and 64 bytes) are done using
> PIO, then eight 512-byte reads using PDMA and then it fails on a
> 254-byte read. First 128 bytes are read using PDMA and the next PDMA
> operation hangs waiting forever for the host buffer to be ready.
>
A 128-byte PDMA receive followed by 126-byte PDMA receive? I don't see how
that is possible given round_down(126, 128) == 0. Was this the actual
'len' argument to NCR5380_pread() in g_NCR5380.c?
BTW, I presume that FLAG_NO_DMA_FIXUPS was set (which is the case if you
pass ncr_53c400=1 option with modprobe). Otherwise you could see PDMA IO
sizes like 127 etc.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists