lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87lh9oyxj7.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 Nov 2015 09:51:56 +0800
From:	"Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:	Avi Kivity <avi@...lladb.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	0day robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, <lkp@...org>,
	Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp] [direct] e594571852: xfstests.generic.299.fail

Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> writes:

>   Hello,
>
> On Mon 23-11-15 16:29:25, kernel test robot wrote:
>> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>> 
>> git://internal_merge_and_test_tree
>> revert-e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e-e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e
>> commit e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e ("direct-io: Fix negative return from dio read beyond eof")
>
> Do you have the file:
>
> /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//generic/299.full
>
> produced by the failed test? Thanks!

Sorry, we don't collect that data during regular regression test.  Is
that needed all the time?  We will change our test scripts to collect
that data.  But that need some time.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ