[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdGAAh56dJRh=ETJLJGFguuw+6mNSfRQ7Br7tAjeZv+3w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:35:49 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] mfd: axp20x: Split the driver into core and i2c bits
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 5:48 AM, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org> wrote:
>>> The axp20x driver assumes the device is i2c based. This is not the
>>> case with later chips, which use a proprietary 2 wire serial bus
>>> by Allwinner called "Reduced Serial Bus".
>>>
>>> This patch follows the example of mfd/wm831x and splits it into
>>> an interface independent core, and an i2c specific glue layer.
>>> MFD_AXP20X and the new MFD_AXP20X_I2C are changed to tristate
>>> symbols, allowing the driver to be built as modules.
>>>
>>> Included but unused header files are removed as well.
So…
>>> + if (dev->of_node) {
>>
>> What about
>>
>> if (…of_node) {
>> const struct of_device_id *id;
>> …
>> } else if ACPI_COMPANION(…) {
This should be has_acpi_companion().
>> const struct acpi_device_id *id;
>> …
>> } else {
>> return -ENODEV;
>> }
>
> I really don't want to change code that I'm just moving around.
> Same goes for the other comments about this patch. I can do another
> patch on top of this to fix the style issues if it really bothers
> people.
Fair enough.
My comments mostly about unnecessity of second parameter in the functions.
So, you already did some clean up in this patch (above), what about
to do another? I also prefer separate patch *before* you do a split.
>>> + axp20x = devm_kzalloc(&i2c->dev, sizeof(*axp20x), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!axp20x)
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> + ret = axp20x_i2c_match_device(axp20x, &i2c->dev);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + return ret;
>>> +
>>> + axp20x->dev = &i2c->dev;
>>> + axp20x->irq = i2c->irq;
>>
>> If you move _match_device() here you will be able to drop away struct
>> device * parameter.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists