[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <565459E2.7030708@sigmadesigns.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:36:50 +0100
From: Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@...madesigns.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mans Rullgard <mans@...sr.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Sebastian Frias <sebastian_frias@...madesigns.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource: Store reg field within struct clocksource
On 19/11/2015 14:57, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2015, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>> On 19/11/2015 12:14, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>
>>> So yes, the alignment of the clocksource struct is not longer
>>> relevant. The case where we access clocksource->max_cycles is when
>>> CONFIG_DEBUG_TIMEKEEPING is enabled, which imposes worse performance
>>> problems to timekeeping than the extra cacheline.
>>>
>>> So the simple solution for this issue is indeed the one liner below.
>>
>> It would make sense to also remove the comment emphasizing the
>> alignment requirement.
>
> Indeed.
Thomas,
Will you commit that patch yourself?
Regards.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists