lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 18:12:31 -0800 From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: clean up the kbuild tree? > > 5.x is better than 4.x but it's still a slower. It's also not incremential. > > At the last time I tested with the latest 5.x and stock binutils on > openSUSE Tumbleweed, I failed to build, unfortunately. Partly the > detection of gcc version doesn't work for 5.x, and partly something is Really? It work for me with gcc 5 > missing in binutils side, although it's already built with plugin. Yes it needs HJ Lu's Linux binutils, not the standard FSF binutils. The patch to fix LTO with ld -r was submitted to standard binutils, but they didn't want to fix the issue. -Andi -- ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists