[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOi1vP8CQW6P3-VkSzSSj0xASbuaZdUAfAWAbgxiPBG5OU5-QA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:20:11 +0100
From: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>, Sage Weil <sage@...hat.com>,
Ceph Development <ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] block-rbd: Delete an unnecessary check before the
function call "rbd_dev_destroy"
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 8:44 PM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 20:16:45 +0100
>
> The rbd_dev_destroy() function tests whether its argument is NULL
> and then returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> ---
> drivers/block/rbd.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/rbd.c b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> index 235708c..24a757e 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c
> @@ -5184,8 +5184,7 @@ static int rbd_dev_probe_parent(struct rbd_device *rbd_dev, int depth)
>
> out_err:
> rbd_dev_unparent(rbd_dev);
> - if (parent)
> - rbd_dev_destroy(parent);
> + rbd_dev_destroy(parent);
> return ret;
> }
Applied, see https://github.com/ceph/ceph-client/commit/b0098c3eadd33fa212987dab0529e35c948aaff4.
Thanks,
Ilya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists