[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1448376029.15393.21.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:40:29 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Kevin Fenzi <kevin@...ye.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/13] device property: refactor built-in properties
support
On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 15:37 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 24, 2015 12:22:49 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Instead of using the type and nval fields we will use length (in
> > bytes) of the
> > value. The sanity check is done in the accessors.
> >
> > The built-in property accessors are split in the same way such as
> > device tree.
>
> Do I understand correctly that this is indended to make the built-in
> properties
> follow the DT layout?
Correct.
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists