[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151124161147.GH19888@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:11:47 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Timo Kokkonen <timo.kokkonen@...code.fi>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] watchdog: Introduce hardware maximum timeout in
watchdog core
Hello Guenter,
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 07:03:13AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> thanks a lot for the Ack. I have v6 in the works, which changes recording
> of last_keepalive when the watchdog is started. Does your Ack include that
> change, or do you prefer to have another look ?
this change is to sample jiffies before .start is called as I suggested,
right? For that change keeping my ack is ok of course.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists