[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56548E03.2080704@ezchip.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 11:19:15 -0500
From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>,
"Christoph Lameter" <cl@...ux.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] nohz: New tick dependency mask
On 11/13/2015 09:22 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> The tick dependency is evaluated on every IRQ. This is a batch of checks
> which determine whether it is safe to stop the tick or not. These checks
> are often split in many details: posix cpu timers, scheduler, sched clock,
> perf events. Each of which are made of smaller details: posix cpu
> timer involves checking process wide timers then thread wide timers. Perf
> involves checking freq events then more per cpu details.
>
> Checking these details asynchronously every time we update the full
> dynticks state bring avoidable overhead and a messy layout.
>
> Lets introduce instead tick dependency masks: one for system wide
> dependency (unstable sched clock), one for CPU wide dependency (sched,
> perf), and task/signal level dependencies. The subsystems are responsible
> of setting and clearing their dependency through a set of APIs that will
> take care of concurrent dependency mask modifications and kick targets
> to restart the relevant CPU tick whenever needed.
>
> This new dependency engine stays beside the old one until all subsystems
> having a tick dependency are converted to it.
>
>
> +void tick_nohz_set_dep_cpu(enum tick_dependency_bit bit, int cpu)
> +{
> + unsigned long prev;
> + struct tick_sched *ts;
> +
> + ts = per_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_sched, cpu);
> +
> + prev = fetch_or(&ts->tick_dependency, BIT_MASK(bit));
> + if (!prev) {
> + preempt_disable();
> + /* Perf needs local kick that is NMI safe */
> + if (cpu == smp_processor_id()) {
> + tick_nohz_full_kick();
> + } else {
> + /* Remote irq work not NMI-safe */
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(in_nmi());
Better to say "if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(in_nmi()))" here instead so
we don't actually try to kick if we are in an NMI?
--
Chris Metcalf, EZChip Semiconductor
http://www.ezchip.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists