[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <565495AC.9050008@google.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 08:51:56 -0800
From: Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>
To: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>, greg@...ah.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
daniels@...labora.com,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.co.uk>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Riley Andrews <riandrews@...roid.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging/android: add TODO to de-stage android sync
framework
On 11/23/15 11:41 AM, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> + - remove sw_sync, it is used only for testing/debugging and should not be
> +upstreamed.
> + - port sw_sync testcases to use debugfs somehow
A quick but important nitpick:
sw_sync itself is just an in-kernel helper for creating fences, when you
don't have something like sync timeline primitives baked into your hardware.
CONFIG_SW_SYNC_USER adds the interface for creating and signaling
sw_sync objects from userspace. This is the part that's dangerous and
only intended for testing, etc.
AFAIK CONFIG_SW_SYNC_USER is the only part people have been objecting
to. I'm fine with removing it. Removing the kernel-facing side of
sw_sync would be a problem for us, since many drivers use it to create
their fences.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists