[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6720400.mTdslW7yXO@wuerfel>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 20:53:04 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Kevin Fenzi <kevin@...ye.com>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 11/13] mfd: intel-lpss: Pass HSUART configuration via properties
On Tuesday 24 November 2015 12:22:57 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> +static struct property_entry uart_properties[] = {
> + PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("reg-io-width", 4),
> + PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("reg-shift", 2),
> + PROPERTY_ENTRY_U8("snps,uart-16550-compatible", 1),
> + { },
>
If I read the binding correctly, the "snps,uart-16550-compatible" property
is meant to be boolean, meaning true if present and zero-length or false
if absent. Using a u8 propert instead feels wrong.
Maybe we can have a PROPERTY_ENTRY_BOOL() for that?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists