[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5654C314.7050201@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 15:05:40 -0500
From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, timur@...eaurora.org,
cov@...eaurora.org, jcm@...hat.com,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] acpi: add support for extended IRQ to PCI link
On 11/24/2015 1:11 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> As Andy mentioned, please wrap this text to use more of an 80-column
> line. I fill changelogs to 75 columns (vi textwidth=75), which fits
> perfectly when "git log" inserts 4 leading spaces.
>
will do
>
> These changes are basically all bounds-checking link->irq.possible[i]
> and link->irq.active. What if you put that checking at the point
> where we *initialize* those fields instead, i.e., in
> acpi_pci_link_check_possible() and acpi_pci_link_get_current()? Then
> you'd only have to check each field in one place, and you could easily
> add a message if we see an ID that's too large.
>
I'll post a patch soon.
> I think the current code for ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_EXTENDED_IRQ is buggy
> because it silently truncates IDs to 8 bits.
>
> Bjorn
>
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists