linux-kernel - Re: [Bugfix] x86/PCI: Fix regression caused by commit 4d6b4e69a245

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151124230413.GA11608@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Tue, 24 Nov 2015 23:04:13 +0000
From:	Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	x86@...nel.org, Arthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@...ernode.on.net>
Subject: Re: [Bugfix] x86/PCI: Fix regression caused by commit 4d6b4e69a245

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:19:34PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Quite frankly, I'm more likely to revert the offending commit at this
> point as that's not the only regression reported against it and the
> fix only helps in one case (out of three known to me).

Using 4.4-rc1 and can confirm the patch fixes my regression report. The
revert also fixes it, so either way is good for me!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/