linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: introduce post-init read-only memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGXu5jKe5hZtrUJ7SJ2WTcJvKXftgkAkPjxmvoVjewbC3Kqg9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:44:07 -0800
From:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:	linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" 
	<kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: introduce post-init read-only memory

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> On Nov 24, 2015 1:38 PM, "Kees Cook" <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>>
>> One of the easiest ways to protect the kernel from attack is to reduce
>> the internal attack surface exposed when a "write" flaw is available. By
>> making as much of the kernel read-only as possible, we reduce the
>> attack surface.
>>
>> Many things are written to only during __init, and never changed
>> again. These cannot be made "const" since the compiler will do the wrong
>> thing (we do actually need to write to them). Instead, move these items
>> into a memory region that will be made read-only during mark_rodata_ro()
>> which happens after all kernel __init code has finished.
>>
>> This introduces __read_only as a way to mark such memory, and adds some
>> documentation about the existing __read_mostly marking.
>
> Obligatory bikeshed:  __ro_after_init, please.  It's barely longer,
> and it directly explains what's going on.  __read_only makes me think
> that it's really read-only and could, for example, actually be in ROM.

I'm fine with that. Anyone else want to chime in before I send a v2?

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS & Brillo Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/