[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151125095758.GC29499@pd.tnic>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:57:58 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: 河合英宏 / KAWAI,HIDEHIRO
<hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"kexec@...ts.infradead.org" <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI
<masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Subject: Re: [V5 PATCH 2/4] panic/x86: Allow cpus to save registers even if
they are looping in NMI context
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 09:46:37AM +0000, 河合英宏 / KAWAI,HIDEHIRO wrote:
> Does *old* code mean the code without this patch *series* ?
Yes.
> I prefer this, but we might want to add some more prefix or suffix.
> For example, "conditionally_run_crash_nmi_callback".
That's unnecessary IMO. If you need to express that, you could write
that in a comment above the function definition. Anyone who looks at
the code then will know that it is conditional, like so many other
kernel functions. :)
> Thanks for your deep review!
Thanks for the patience!
:-)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists