[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1511250242100.32374@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 02:45:15 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/compaction: __compact_pgdat() code cleanuup
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> This patch uses is_via_compact_memory() to distinguish direct compaction.
When I think of "direct compaction", I think of compaction triggered for
high-order allocations from the page allocator before direct reclaim.
This is the opposite of being triggered for is_via_compact_memory().
> And it also reduces indentation on compaction_defer_reset
> by filtering failure case. There is no functional change.
>
> Acked-by: Yaowei Bai <baiyaowei@...s.chinamobile.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
> ---
> mm/compaction.c | 13 +++++++------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index de3e1e7..01b1e5e 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -1658,14 +1658,15 @@ static void __compact_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct compact_control *cc)
> !compaction_deferred(zone, cc->order))
> compact_zone(zone, cc);
>
> - if (cc->order > 0) {
> - if (zone_watermark_ok(zone, cc->order,
> - low_wmark_pages(zone), 0, 0))
> - compaction_defer_reset(zone, cc->order, false);
> - }
> -
> VM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&cc->freepages));
> VM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&cc->migratepages));
> +
> + if (is_via_compact_memory(cc->order))
> + continue;
This will be the third call to is_via_compact_memory() in this function.
Maybe just do
const bool sysctl = is_via_compact_memory(cc->order);
early in the function since it won't change during the iteration? (And
maybe get rid of that extra newline that already exists at the beginning
of the iteration?
Otherwise:
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists