lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:30:54 +0800 From: Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com> To: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com> CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, "Daniel Thompson" <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <arnd@...db.de>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...gle.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <pebolle@...cali.nl>, <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>, Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...gle.com>, "Sasha Hauer" <kernel@...gutronix.de>, <mitchelh@...eaurora.org>, Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] MT8173 IOMMU SUPPORT On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 11:38 +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 01:58:13PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 11:26 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:40:02PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote: > > > > But the mtk-iommu depend on the drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c(mtk-iommu > > > > has called a function of the mtk-smi). > > > > So if there is dependence here, How should we do to merge them? > > > > > > I can surely merge mtk-smi too, if it gets proper Reviewed-by and > > > Acked-by tags from the maintainer(s). > > > > > > > > > Joerg > > > > > Hi Joerg, > > > > About the driver/memory/, We don't know who is his maintainer. > > MAINTAINERS file don't have drivers/memory maintainer. > > From the history in drivers/memory/ it looks like most of the > > drivers land with an ack from the architecture maintainer. > > And Matthias Brugger is our "ARM/Mediatek SoC support" maintainer. > > > > Then do you mean that we need Matthias's ACK or whom others? > > Yes, I think the sub-architecture maintainer's ACK is probably going to > be as good as it gets. Historically drivers/memory hasn't had enough of > a common ground to instate a framework. > > Thierry Got it. Thanks very much for your reply. > _______________________________________________ > Linux-mediatek mailing list > Linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists