linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] Support for Cortex-M Prototyping System

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5655C830.7020501@arm.com>
Date:	Wed, 25 Nov 2015 14:39:44 +0000
From:	Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	linux@....linux.org.uk, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, afaerber@...e.de,
	mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, Mark.Rutland@....com,
	Pawel.Moll@....com, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
	galak@...eaurora.org, jslaby@...e.cz, robh+dt@...nel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/10] Support for Cortex-M Prototyping System

On 25/11/15 11:22, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> I'd be happy to hear any feedback/comments on this series!
> Looks pretty good overall, I didn't have any specific concerns.

Thanks for your time!

> 
>> > Remain questions:
>> > 
>> >  - Application notes 399/400 have PSRAM located at address different to what
>> >    we have for AN385/AN386, so I'm wondering what is the best practice to handle
>> >    CONFIG_DRAM_BASE? Different defconfig or there is better place?
> I would not want to add more than one defconfig for a relatively simple
> platform. Most actual users would have to modify their config anyway, so
> I think it's best to just have one config file for the most common machine
> here and let users change the dram base if they have the other one.
> 

I think the same, just wanted to check that I didn't misunderstand
something.

> We can also look at using the Kconfig fragments infrastructure more here.
>  
>> >  - I'm not sure about naming of dts files: Application Notes (mps2-an*) vs Cortex-M (mps2-cm*);
>> >    any preference?
> I don't mind either way.

Ok, I'll leave things as they are till anybody has different opinion on
that.

Cheers
Vladimir

> 
> 	Arnd
> 
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/