[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151125162756.GJ29014@esperanza>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 19:27:57 +0300
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...tuozzo.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vmscan: do not throttle kthreads due to too_many_isolated
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 04:45:13PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 11/25/2015 04:36 PM, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> > Block device drivers often hand off io request processing to kernel
> > threads (example: device mapper). If such a thread calls kmalloc, it can
> > dive into direct reclaim path and end up waiting for too_many_isolated
> > to return false, blocking writeback. This can lead to a dead lock if the
>
> Shouldn't such allocation lack __GFP_IO to prevent this and other kinds of
> deadlocks? And/or have mempools?
Not necessarily. loopback is an example: it can call
grab_cache_write_begin -> add_to_page_cache_lru with GFP_KERNEL.
> PF_KTHREAD looks like a big hammer to me that will solve only one
> potential problem...
This problem can result in processes hanging forever. Any ideas how this
could be fixed in a better way?
Thanks,
Vladimir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists