linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Move parent_pte handling from kvm_mmu_get_page() to link_shadow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 25 Nov 2015 17:32:53 +0100
From:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:	Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>,
	Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc:	kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mtosatti@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Move parent_pte handling from
 kvm_mmu_get_page() to link_shadow_page()



On 20/11/2015 09:57, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> 
> 
> You can move this patch to the front of
> [PATCH 08/10] KVM: x86: MMU: Use for_each_rmap_spte macro instead of
> pte_list_walk()
> 
> By moving kvm_mmu_mark_parents_unsync() to the behind of mmu_spte_set()
> (then the parent
> spte is present now), you can directly clean up for_each_rmap_spte().

So basically squash together the two patches (8/10 and 9/10) except the
change to kvm_mmu_mark_parents_unsync; then in the second patch switch
from pte_list_walk to for_each_rmap_spte.

That makes sense indeed.

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/