[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151125124221.281d6f3d@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 12:42:21 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ftrace: Add separate handler for ftrace:function
event
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 18:12:43 +0100
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
> > Yeah, I'm trying to figure out the paths here. I would love to remove
> > the control_ops as that complicates the function tracing code a bit
> > more than I would like it to be.
>
> perf is using the control interface to enable and disable function
> tracing any time the process (and its events) is scheduled in/out
>
> sched_in(event) -> ftrace_function_local_enable(&event->ftrace_ops)
> sched_out(event) -> ftrace_function_local_disable(&event->ftrace_ops)
OK, I think we can merge the control list to the normal list and have
something like:
(!op->disabled || !ftrace_function_local_disabled(op))
We can also keep the control flag for the ops, and have:
!(op->flags & FTRACE_OPS_FL_CONTROL) || rcu_is_watching()
test too, and use the ftrace ops list code.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists