[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151125184149.GQ3950@piout.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 19:41:49 +0100
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To: Saurabh Sengar <saurabh.truth@...il.com>
Cc: a.zummo@...ertech.it, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/rtc/rtc-tps65910.c: Add IRQF_ONESHOT to
interrupt flags
Hi,
On 25/11/2015 at 23:49:57 +0530, Saurabh Sengar wrote :
> If no primary handler is specified for threaded_irq then a
> default one is assigned which always returns IRQ_WAKE_THREAD.
> This handler requires the IRQF_ONESHOT, because the source of
> interrupt is not disabled
>
Are you sure this is necessary? The parent irqchip is the mfd and it
sets IRQF_ONESHOT.
Does that solve a real problem or is it a false positive coming from a
static analysis tool?
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists