linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Allow customizable random offset to mmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <565606DD.2090502@android.com>
Date:	Wed, 25 Nov 2015 11:07:09 -0800
From:	Daniel Cashman <dcashman@...roid.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
	keescook@...omium.org, mingo@...nel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, corbet@....net,
	dzickus@...hat.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, xypron.glpk@....de,
	jpoimboe@...hat.com, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
	n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com, aarcange@...hat.com, mgorman@...e.de,
	tglx@...utronix.de, rientjes@...gle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, salyzyn@...roid.com, jeffv@...gle.com,
	nnk@...gle.com, catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com,
	hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, hecmargi@....es, bp@...e.de,
	dcashman@...gle.com, Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Allow customizable random offset to mmap_base
 address.

On 11/24/2015 04:39 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:

> mips, powerpc and s390 also implement arch_mmap_rnd().  Are there any
> special considerations here, or it just a matter of maintainers wiring
> it up and testing it?

I had not yet looked at those at all, as I had no way to do even a
rudimentary "does it boot" test and opted to post v3 first.  Upon first
glance, it should just be a matter of wiring it up:

Mips is divided into 12/16 bits for 32/64 bit (assume baseline 4k page)
w/COMPAT kconfig,  powerpc is 11/18 w/COMPAT, s390 is 11/11 w/COMPAT.
s390 is a bit strange as COMPAT is for a 31-bit address space, although
is_32bit_task() is used to determine which mask to use, and the mask
itself for 64-bit only introduces 11 bits of entropy, but while still
affecting larger chunks of the address space (mask is 0x3ff80, resulting
in an effective 0x7ff shift of PAGE_SIZE + 7 bits).

I could go ahead and add these to patchset v4 and as with the previous
architectures, rely on feedback from arch-specific maintainers to help
tune and test the values.

-Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/