linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] ARM: orion5x/dove/mv78xx0 multiplatform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2762753.604XuTRa75@wuerfel>
Date:	Wed, 25 Nov 2015 21:05:02 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ARM: orion5x/dove/mv78xx0 multiplatform

On Wednesday 25 November 2015 18:37:28 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 05:09:37PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > Russell, you are the last known user of mach-dove. What are your
> > plans? You keep saying you have given up trying to mainline your Cubox
> > patches. Have you really given up? Can we remove mach-dove?
> 
> Right now, I'm developing etnaviv in spare time on the Cubox[*], which
> is still primarily running a non-DT kernel.
> 
> It's actually a kernel that I've hacked which is capable of booting
> both DT and non-DT, but even when booted in DT mode, I still require
> much of the arch/arm/mach-dove infrastructure to get things like
> armada-drm, etnaviv and other drivers running.  Especially because
> we're missing things like the high-speed clocks (the stuff above the
> tclk domain.)  I've not even started to work out how to get that
> into mainline, or how to integrate that with CCF.  Quite what can be
> done with the audio patches, I've no idea, that remains a bone of
> contention and stalemate, and currently isn't DT-able.  See the list
> of patches at the end of this message...

I think it's ok to keep mach-dove around for a longer time to keep the
board file, I'm way more interested in completing the multiplatform
work at last.

If I understand you right, being able to build mach-dove and mach-mvebu
together will actually help you remove one or more of your patches,
but of course will require a small bit of rebasing.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/