[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17689711.DsQsCiDFAN@wuerfel>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 22:51 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...ian.org>,
Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] arm: boot: store ATAGs structure into DT "/chosen/linux,atags" entry
On Wednesday 25 November 2015 22:44:28 Pali Rohár wrote:
>
> Arnd, my question about proper solution reminds... Proprietary
> bootloader which cannot be replaced (e.g. it is signed or do unknown
> magic) provides information to booted kernel via custom specific ATAGs
> fields. How userspace could properly read those custom information from
> bootloader?
The typical solution for nonstandard bootloaders is to have a boot wrapper
like the one from https://github.com/zonque/pxa-impedance-matcher that
translates whatever information we have at the bootloader level into
DT properties.
As I understand, the reason we are not doing that here is that we also
have proprietary user space that we can't fix to look in a different
place, i.e. the interface is between the bootloader and some user
binary, not bootloader to kernel.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists