[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3842139.m8b6S96gUd@wuerfel>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 22:57:33 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Chao Xie <chao.xie@...vell.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] clk: mmp: stop using platform headers
On Wednesday 25 November 2015 13:32:22 Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 11/25, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 25 November 2015 11:21:14 Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > On 11/25, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/mmp/clk-mmp2.c b/drivers/clk/mmp/clk-mmp2.c
> > > > index 09d2832fbd78..38931dbd1eff 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/clk/mmp/clk-mmp2.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/clk/mmp/clk-mmp2.c
> > > > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> > > > * warranty of any kind, whether express or implied.
> > > > */
> > > >
> > > > +#include <linux/clk.h>
> > >
> > > Why are we adding this include? I don't see any clk consumer API
> > > usage being added.
> >
> > drivers/clk/mmp/clk-pxa910.c: In function 'pxa910_clk_init':
> > drivers/clk/mmp/clk-pxa910.c:166:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'clk_set_rate' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > clk_set_rate(uart_pll, 14745600);
> > ^
> > drivers/clk/mmp/clk-pxa910.c:209:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'clk_set_parent' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > clk_set_parent(clk, uart_pll);
> > ^
> >
> > Is there anything I need to change here?
> >
>
> Hmph. I seems this broke when we removed the clk.h include from
> clk-provider.h, but nobody has noticed for months. Can you make a
> different commit to add the header? Otherwise we're sneaking in
> that include to get this file to compile again.
Ok, I hadn't noticed at all that it was broken in mainline already,
as the three mmp defconfigs do not use drivers/clk/ at all but instead
rely on arch/arm/mach-mmp/clock*.c instead, which has a separate
implementation.
With the move to multiplatform, the choice goes away and we use the
common clock implementation unconditionally.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists