[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1448425601.3762.9.camel@ellerman.id.au>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 15:26:41 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Daniel Cashman <dcashman@...roid.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, keescook@...omium.org, mingo@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, corbet@....net,
dzickus@...hat.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, xypron.glpk@....de,
jpoimboe@...hat.com, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com, aarcange@...hat.com, mgorman@...e.de,
tglx@...utronix.de, rientjes@...gle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, salyzyn@...roid.com, jeffv@...gle.com,
nnk@...gle.com, catalin.marinas@....com, hpa@...or.com,
x86@...nel.org, hecmargi@....es, bp@...e.de, dcashman@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] arm64: mm: support ARCH_MMAP_RND_BITS.
On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 10:55 -0800, Daniel Cashman wrote:
> On 11/23/2015 07:04 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 03:20:07PM -0800, Daniel Cashman wrote:
> > > +config ARCH_MMAP_RND_BITS_MAX
> > > + default 20 if ARM64_64K_PAGES && ARCH_VA_BITS=39
> > > + default 24 if ARCH_VA_BITS=39
> > > + default 23 if ARM64_64K_PAGES && ARCH_VA_BITS=42
> > > + default 27 if ARCH_VA_BITS=42
> > > + default 29 if ARM64_64K_PAGES && ARCH_VA_BITS=48
> > > + default 33 if ARCH_VA_BITS=48
> > > + default 15 if ARM64_64K_PAGES
> > > + default 19
> > > +
> > > +config ARCH_MMAP_RND_COMPAT_BITS_MIN
> > > + default 7 if ARM64_64K_PAGES
> > > + default 11
> >
> > FYI: we now support 16k pages too, so this might need updating. It would
> > be much nicer if this was somehow computed rather than have the results
> > all open-coded like this.
>
> Yes, I ideally wanted this to be calculated based on the different page
> options and VA_BITS (which itself has a similar stanza), but I don't
> know how to do that/if it is currently supported in Kconfig. This would
> be even more desirable with the addition of 16K_PAGES, as with this
> setup we have a combinatorial problem.
>
> We could move this logic into the code where min/max are initialized,
> but that would create its own mess, creating new Kconfig values to
> introduce it in an arch-agnostic way after patch-set v2 moved that to
> mm/mmap.c instead of arch/${arch}/mm/mmap.c Suggestions welcome.
Could we instead change the meaning of the mmap_rnd_bits value to be the number
of address space bits that may be randomised?
ie. 40 would mean "please randomise in a 1T range", which with PAGE_SIZE=4K
gives you 28 random bits. etc.
That would make the value independent of PAGE_SIZE, and only depend on the size
of the address space.
It would also mean the values userspace sets and sees don't need to change if the
kernel PAGE_SIZE changes. (which probably doesn't happen often but still)
cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists