[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFqWnZV6qaXb-mwXW-V=m0bJbi5+unJxPSTpkdT=coXZ3A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:56:08 +0100
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@...iatek.com>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Minda Chen <Minda.Chen@....com>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: core: fix __mmc_switch timeout caused by preempt
On 26 November 2015 at 03:51, Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@...iatek.com> wrote:
> there is a time window between __mmc_send_status() and time_afer(),
> on some eMMC chip, the timeout_ms is only 10ms, if this thread was
> scheduled out during this period, then, even card has already changes
> to transfer state by the result of CMD13, this part of code also treat
> it to timeout error.
> So, need calculate timeout first, then call __mmc_send_status(), if
> already timeout and card still in programing state, then treat it to
> the real timeout error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@...iatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c | 23 ++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
> index 1f44426..0add634 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
> @@ -489,6 +489,7 @@ int __mmc_switch(struct mmc_card *card, u8 set, u8 index, u8 value,
> unsigned long timeout;
> u32 status = 0;
> bool use_r1b_resp = use_busy_signal;
> + bool expired = false;
No need to assign an initial value.
>
> mmc_retune_hold(host);
>
> @@ -544,10 +545,22 @@ int __mmc_switch(struct mmc_card *card, u8 set, u8 index, u8 value,
> /* Must check status to be sure of no errors. */
> timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(timeout_ms);
> do {
> + /* Timeout if the device never leaves the program state.
Please start mutli-row comment with an empty line.
> + * must check it firstly to avoid problem caused by preempt.
Please rephrase this to:
Due to the possibility of being preempted after sending the status
command, check the expiration time first.
> + */
> + expired = time_after(jiffies, timeout);
I think we can move this inside the below "if (send_status) {"
.. but of course before sending the status command.
> +
> if (send_status) {
> err = __mmc_send_status(card, &status, ignore_crc);
> - if (err)
> + if (err) {
> goto out;
> + } else if (expired &&
You may use a new "if" statement instead of an "else if", due to the
above "goto out".
> + R1_CURRENT_STATE(status) == R1_STATE_PRG) {
> + pr_err("%s: Card stuck in programming state! %s\n",
> + mmc_hostname(host), __func__);
> + err = -ETIMEDOUT;
> + goto out;
> + }
> }
> if ((host->caps & MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY) && use_r1b_resp)
> break;
> @@ -563,14 +576,6 @@ int __mmc_switch(struct mmc_card *card, u8 set, u8 index, u8 value,
> mmc_delay(timeout_ms);
> goto out;
> }
> -
> - /* Timeout if the device never leaves the program state. */
> - if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
> - pr_err("%s: Card stuck in programming state! %s\n",
> - mmc_hostname(host), __func__);
> - err = -ETIMEDOUT;
> - goto out;
> - }
> } while (R1_CURRENT_STATE(status) == R1_STATE_PRG);
>
> err = mmc_switch_status_error(host, status);
> --
> 1.8.1.1.dirty
>
Kind regards
Uffe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists