[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5656607C.40907@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 09:29:32 +0800
From: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@...wei.com>
To: 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI
<masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
"acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org" <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>,
"pi3orama@....com" <pi3orama@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf probe: Adjust dso->long_name for offline module
On 2015/11/26 9:10, 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI wrote:
> From: Wang Nan [mailto:wangnan0@...wei.com]
>> If libelf unable to open debuginfo for an offline module but the ko has
>> symtab, something unexpected may happen.
>>
>> # rm -rf ~/.debug/
>> # mv /usr/lib64/elfutils/libebl_x86_64.so{,.bak}
> Please do give more possible usecase. removing libebl is crazy,
> and broken environment.
It is a real problem we met, where perf itself is statically linked
and copied to target platform.
> If you'd like to use perf probe without debuginfo, make NO_DWARF=1 or
> strip the target binary.
Can't simply stripping the target binary because the symtab would
also be stipped out.
>> # ./perf probe -m /home/wangnan/kmodule/mymodule.ko my_func
>> [mymodule] with build id 326ab42550ef3d24944f53c817533728367effeb not found, continuing without symbols
>> Failed to find symbol my_func in /home/wangnan/kmodule/mymodule.ko
>> Error: Failed to add events
>> # ./perf buildid-cache -a ./mymodule.ko
>> # ./perf probe -m /home/wangnan/kmodule/mymodule.ko my_func
>> Added new event:
>> probe:my_func (on my_func in /home/wangnan/kmodule/mymodule.ko)
>>
>> You can now use it in all perf tools, such as:
>>
>> perf record -e probe:my_func -aR sleep 1
>>
>> In the above example, probe fails if it isn't in buildid-cache. However,
>> user would expect it success in both case because perf is able to find
>> probe points actually.
>>
>> The problem is because perf won't utilize module's full path if it
>> failed to open debuginfo. In
>> convert_to_probe_trace_events ->
>> find_probe_trace_events_from_map ->
>> get_target_map ->
>> kernel_get_module_map ->
>> machine__findnew_module_map ->
>> map_groups__find_by_name
>>
>> map_groups__find_by_name() is able to find the map of that module, but
>> this information is found from /proc/modules before it knows the real
>> path of the offline module. Therefore, the map->dso->long_name is
>> set to something like '[mymodule]', which prevents dso__load() find
>> the real path of the module file.
> Hmm, if so, it should be fixed in map or machine, not in probe-event.c.
Will do in next version.
Thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists