[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vcd6SuGNMmWh1Jwd4bPHwjXOf1MV62GNDttFtevUf1ykQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:22:11 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/7] test_hexdump: go through all possible lengths of buffer
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Rasmus Villemoes
<linux@...musvillemoes.dk> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20 2015, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:07 +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Why keep the variable l when it is just a synonym for the new
>>> parameter buflen? It is quite confusing that you change some but not
>>> all occurrences of l to buflen. If you want to make the diff minimal
>>> but still have a descriptive parameter name, just keep the 'size_t l
>>> =
>>> buflen;' assignment and don't otherwise refer to buflen. But I think
>>> it's better to eliminate 'l' and just change everything to
>>> buflen. Don't mix the two approaches, though.
>>
>> Okay, I got it for the future, though the series is already in linux-
>> next, so do we really need to re-hack half of it because of that?
>
> Stuff in -next isn't set in stone. I'm pretty sure Andrew can replace
> one set of patches with another.
Thanks for your review. I;m busy currently with some other stuff, you
might have noticed, I will return back to the series maybe next week.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists