[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151126192522.25b297ec@free-electrons.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 19:25:22 +0100
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
To: Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
linux@....linux.org.uk, sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com,
andrew@...n.ch, jason@...edaemon.net,
gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com, simon.guinot@...uanux.org,
nadavh@...vell.com, alior@...vell.com, xswang@...vell.com,
myair@...vell.com, nitroshift@...oo.com, jaz@...ihalf.com,
tn@...ihalf.com, <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net 1/6] net: mvneta: add configuration for MBUS
windows access protection
Marcin,
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 19:08:08 +0100, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
> This commit adds missing configuration of MBUS windows access protection
> in mvneta_conf_mbus_windows function - a dedicated variable for that
> purpose remained there unused since v3.8 initial mvneta support. Because
> of that the register contents were inherited from the bootloader.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v3.8+
> Fixes: c5aff18204da ("net: mvneta: driver for Marvell Armada 370/XP network
> unit")
Is this actually fixing a user visible problem? If not, then I am not
sure it qualifies for stable.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> index e84c7f2..c4327b9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@
> #define MVNETA_WIN_SIZE(w) (0x2204 + ((w) << 3))
> #define MVNETA_WIN_REMAP(w) (0x2280 + ((w) << 2))
> #define MVNETA_BASE_ADDR_ENABLE 0x2290
> +#define MVNETA_ACCESS_PROTECT_ENABLE 0x2294
Spaces are used for indentation in the definitions of all other
constants in this driver, so I think you should stick with this
convention, at least to remain consistent.
> #define MVNETA_PORT_CONFIG 0x2400
> #define MVNETA_UNI_PROMISC_MODE BIT(0)
> #define MVNETA_DEF_RXQ(q) ((q) << 1)
> @@ -3188,9 +3189,11 @@ static void mvneta_conf_mbus_windows(struct mvneta_port *pp,
>
> win_enable &= ~(1 << i);
> win_protect |= 3 << (2 * i);
> +
Unneeded change.
> }
>
> mvreg_write(pp, MVNETA_BASE_ADDR_ENABLE, win_enable);
> + mvreg_write(pp, MVNETA_ACCESS_PROTECT_ENABLE, win_protect);
> }
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists