[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2717087.4cxEA98ZJk@wuerfel>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 16:51:38 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@...inx.com>,
robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
michals@...inx.com, sorenb@...inx.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
tinamdar@....com, treding@...dia.com, rjui@...adcom.com,
Minghuan.Lian@...escale.com, m-karicheri2@...com, hauke@...ke-m.de,
marc.zyngier@....com, dhdang@....com, sbranden@...adcom.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@...inx.com>,
Ravi Kiran Gummaluri <rgummal@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10] PCI: Xilinx-NWL-PCIe: Added support for Xilinx NWL PCIe Host Controller
On Friday 27 November 2015 20:32:03 Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> + do {
> + err = nwl_pcie_link_up(pcie, PHY_RDY_LINKUP);
> + if (err != 1) {
> + check_link_up++;
> + if (check_link_up > LINKUP_ITER_CHECK)
> + return -ENODEV;
> + mdelay(1000);
> + }
> + } while (!err);
mdelay(1000) is not something anyone should do. Why can't you call
a sleeping function here?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists