linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] Documentation: dt-bindings: regulator: add LM363x regulator binding information

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151127220733.GT1929@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Fri, 27 Nov 2015 22:07:33 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:	Milo Kim <milo.kim@...com>, lee.jones@...aro.org,
	j.anaszewski@...sung.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] Documentation: dt-bindings: regulator: add LM363x
 regulator binding information

On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 02:44:50PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 12:37:50PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 03:57:00PM +0900, Milo Kim wrote:

> > > This binding describes LM3631 and LM3632 regulator properties.

> > Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsystem.

> Which for bindings, my preference is "dt-bindings: ..." I assume you 
> meant to follow regulator style though. 

Given that maintainers are generally expected to review and apply
bindings themselves it seems sensible (and it's what we mostly seem to
do).

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)