| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1448673751-20949-11-git-send-email-acme@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 22:22:31 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>, pi3orama@....com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 10/10] perf bpf: Rename bpf config to program config
From: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Following patches are going to introduce BPF object level configuration
to enable setting values into BPF maps. To avoid confusion, this patch
renames existing 'config' in bpf-loader.c to 'program config'. Following
patches would introduce 'object config'.
Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>
Cc: pi3orama@....com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1448614067-197576-4-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c
index 36544e5ece43..540a7efa657e 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ bpf_prog_priv__clear(struct bpf_program *prog __maybe_unused,
}
static int
-config__exec(const char *value, struct perf_probe_event *pev)
+prog_config__exec(const char *value, struct perf_probe_event *pev)
{
pev->uprobes = true;
pev->target = strdup(value);
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ config__exec(const char *value, struct perf_probe_event *pev)
}
static int
-config__module(const char *value, struct perf_probe_event *pev)
+prog_config__module(const char *value, struct perf_probe_event *pev)
{
pev->uprobes = false;
pev->target = strdup(value);
@@ -140,8 +140,7 @@ config__module(const char *value, struct perf_probe_event *pev)
}
static int
-config__bool(const char *value,
- bool *pbool, bool invert)
+prog_config__bool(const char *value, bool *pbool, bool invert)
{
int err;
bool bool_value;
@@ -158,17 +157,17 @@ config__bool(const char *value,
}
static int
-config__inlines(const char *value,
- struct perf_probe_event *pev __maybe_unused)
+prog_config__inlines(const char *value,
+ struct perf_probe_event *pev __maybe_unused)
{
- return config__bool(value, &probe_conf.no_inlines, true);
+ return prog_config__bool(value, &probe_conf.no_inlines, true);
}
static int
-config__force(const char *value,
- struct perf_probe_event *pev __maybe_unused)
+prog_config__force(const char *value,
+ struct perf_probe_event *pev __maybe_unused)
{
- return config__bool(value, &probe_conf.force_add, false);
+ return prog_config__bool(value, &probe_conf.force_add, false);
}
static struct {
@@ -176,58 +175,58 @@ static struct {
const char *usage;
const char *desc;
int (*func)(const char *, struct perf_probe_event *);
-} bpf_config_terms[] = {
+} bpf_prog_config_terms[] = {
{
.key = "exec",
.usage = "exec=<full path of file>",
.desc = "Set uprobe target",
- .func = config__exec,
+ .func = prog_config__exec,
},
{
.key = "module",
.usage = "module=<module name> ",
.desc = "Set kprobe module",
- .func = config__module,
+ .func = prog_config__module,
},
{
.key = "inlines",
.usage = "inlines=[yes|no] ",
.desc = "Probe at inline symbol",
- .func = config__inlines,
+ .func = prog_config__inlines,
},
{
.key = "force",
.usage = "force=[yes|no] ",
.desc = "Forcibly add events with existing name",
- .func = config__force,
+ .func = prog_config__force,
},
};
static int
-do_config(const char *key, const char *value,
- struct perf_probe_event *pev)
+do_prog_config(const char *key, const char *value,
+ struct perf_probe_event *pev)
{
unsigned int i;
pr_debug("config bpf program: %s=%s\n", key, value);
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_config_terms); i++)
- if (strcmp(key, bpf_config_terms[i].key) == 0)
- return bpf_config_terms[i].func(value, pev);
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_prog_config_terms); i++)
+ if (strcmp(key, bpf_prog_config_terms[i].key) == 0)
+ return bpf_prog_config_terms[i].func(value, pev);
- pr_debug("BPF: ERROR: invalid config option in object: %s=%s\n",
+ pr_debug("BPF: ERROR: invalid program config option: %s=%s\n",
key, value);
- pr_debug("\nHint: Currently valid options are:\n");
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_config_terms); i++)
- pr_debug("\t%s:\t%s\n", bpf_config_terms[i].usage,
- bpf_config_terms[i].desc);
+ pr_debug("\nHint: Valid options are:\n");
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_prog_config_terms); i++)
+ pr_debug("\t%s:\t%s\n", bpf_prog_config_terms[i].usage,
+ bpf_prog_config_terms[i].desc);
pr_debug("\n");
- return -BPF_LOADER_ERRNO__CONFIG_TERM;
+ return -BPF_LOADER_ERRNO__PROGCONF_TERM;
}
static const char *
-parse_config_kvpair(const char *config_str, struct perf_probe_event *pev)
+parse_prog_config_kvpair(const char *config_str, struct perf_probe_event *pev)
{
char *text = strdup(config_str);
char *sep, *line;
@@ -253,7 +252,7 @@ parse_config_kvpair(const char *config_str, struct perf_probe_event *pev)
}
*equ = '\0';
- err = do_config(line, equ + 1, pev);
+ err = do_prog_config(line, equ + 1, pev);
if (err)
break;
nextline:
@@ -268,10 +267,10 @@ nextline:
}
static int
-parse_config(const char *config_str, struct perf_probe_event *pev)
+parse_prog_config(const char *config_str, struct perf_probe_event *pev)
{
int err;
- const char *main_str = parse_config_kvpair(config_str, pev);
+ const char *main_str = parse_prog_config_kvpair(config_str, pev);
if (IS_ERR(main_str))
return PTR_ERR(main_str);
@@ -312,7 +311,7 @@ config_bpf_program(struct bpf_program *prog)
pev = &priv->pev;
pr_debug("bpf: config program '%s'\n", config_str);
- err = parse_config(config_str, pev);
+ err = parse_prog_config(config_str, pev);
if (err)
goto errout;
@@ -750,7 +749,7 @@ static const char *bpf_loader_strerror_table[NR_ERRNO] = {
[ERRCODE_OFFSET(EVENTNAME)] = "No event name found in config string",
[ERRCODE_OFFSET(INTERNAL)] = "BPF loader internal error",
[ERRCODE_OFFSET(COMPILE)] = "Error when compiling BPF scriptlet",
- [ERRCODE_OFFSET(CONFIG_TERM)] = "Invalid config term in config string",
+ [ERRCODE_OFFSET(PROGCONF_TERM)] = "Invalid program config term in config string",
[ERRCODE_OFFSET(PROLOGUE)] = "Failed to generate prologue",
[ERRCODE_OFFSET(PROLOGUE2BIG)] = "Prologue too big for program",
[ERRCODE_OFFSET(PROLOGUEOOB)] = "Offset out of bound for prologue",
@@ -834,7 +833,7 @@ int bpf__strerror_probe(struct bpf_object *obj __maybe_unused,
int err, char *buf, size_t size)
{
bpf__strerror_head(err, buf, size);
- case BPF_LOADER_ERRNO__CONFIG_TERM: {
+ case BPF_LOADER_ERRNO__PROGCONF_TERM: {
scnprintf(buf, size, "%s (add -v to see detail)", emsg);
break;
}
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.h b/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.h
index a58740b0f31e..6fdc0457e2b6 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.h
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ enum bpf_loader_errno {
BPF_LOADER_ERRNO__EVENTNAME, /* Event name is missing */
BPF_LOADER_ERRNO__INTERNAL, /* BPF loader internal error */
BPF_LOADER_ERRNO__COMPILE, /* Error when compiling BPF scriptlet */
- BPF_LOADER_ERRNO__CONFIG_TERM, /* Invalid config term in config term */
+ BPF_LOADER_ERRNO__PROGCONF_TERM,/* Invalid program config term in config string */
BPF_LOADER_ERRNO__PROLOGUE, /* Failed to generate prologue */
BPF_LOADER_ERRNO__PROLOGUE2BIG, /* Prologue too big for program */
BPF_LOADER_ERRNO__PROLOGUEOOB, /* Offset out of bound for prologue */
--
2.1.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists