lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 12:33:28 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> To: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>, Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Sebastian Reichel <sre@...ian.org>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>, Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] arm: boot: store ATAGs structure into DT "/chosen/linux,atags" entry On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 06:28:50PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Fri, 27 Nov 2015, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > I don't mind creating the /proc/atags compatibility hack from the kernel > > for a DT based N700 kernel, as long as we limit it as much as we can > > to the machines that need it. Leaving a board file for the N700 in place > > that contains the procfs code (and not much more) seems reasonable > > here, as we are talking about a board specific hack and the whole point > > appears to be running unmodified user space. > > > > Regarding how to get the data into the kernel in the first place, my > > preferred choice would still be to have an intermediate bootloader > > such as pxa-impedance-matcher, but I won't complain if others are > > happy enough about putting it into the ATAGS compat code we already > > have, as long as it's limited to the boards we know need it. > > Assuming you have a N700 board file for special procfs code, then why > not getting at the atags in memory where the bootloader has put them > directly from that same board file? This way it'll really be limited to > the board we know needs it and the special exception will be contained > to that one file. Amongst the machine specific hooks, there is one that > gets invoked early during boot before those atags are overwritten. I've already suggested that. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists