linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] ste_dma40: Delete another unnecessary check in d40

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdZ=NkrmuZpq8YtseFxBB8g2Nc2ae231PjO+-c0+jd+GDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 29 Nov 2015 22:28:59 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ste_dma40: Delete another unnecessary check in d40_probe()

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:24 PM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 21:56:07 +0100
>
> A single jump label was used by the d40_probe() function in several cases
> for error handling which was a bit inefficient here.
>
> * This implementation detail could be improved by the introduction
>   of another jump label.
>
> * Remove an extra check for the variable "base".
>
> * Omit its explicit initialisation at the beginning then.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>

Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/