[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1448868893-4575-5-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 16:34:41 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 04/16] clk: remove unnecessary !core->parents conditional
This if-block has been here since the introduction of the common
clock framework. Now no clock drivers are statically initialized.
core->parent is always NULL at this point. Drop the redundant
check and the confusing comment.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
---
drivers/clk/clk.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index 36373d3..66c6f34 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -2348,11 +2348,8 @@ static int __clk_core_init(struct clk_core *core)
* in to clk_init during early boot; thus any access to core->parents[]
* must always check for a NULL pointer and try to populate it if
* necessary.
- *
- * If core->parents is not NULL we skip this entire block. This allows
- * for clock drivers to statically initialize core->parents.
*/
- if (core->num_parents > 1 && !core->parents) {
+ if (core->num_parents > 1) {
core->parents = kcalloc(core->num_parents, sizeof(struct clk *),
GFP_KERNEL);
/*
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists