[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151130083858.GB4045@osiris>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 09:38:58 +0100
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: will.deacon@....com, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM64: fix building without CONFIG_UID16
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:12:21PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> As reported by Michal Simek, building an ARM64 kernel with CONFIG_UID16
> disabled currently fails because the system call table still needs to
> reference the individual function entry points that are provided by
> kernel/sys_ni.c in this case, and the declarations are hidden inside
> of #ifdef CONFIG_UID16:
Will we ever get rid of UID16? kernel/uid.c contains this nice comment:
/*
* Wrapper functions for 16bit uid back compatibility. All nicely tied
* together in the faint hope we can take the out in five years time.
*/
Which seems to exist since at least February 2000. ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists