[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <565C4093.9010802@samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:26:59 +0100
From: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>
To: "Kim, Milo" <milo.kim@...com>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, lee.jones@...aro.org, broonie@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] leds: add LM3633 driver
On 11/30/2015 09:48 AM, Kim, Milo wrote:
> Hi Jacek,
>
> Thanks for your detailed feedback. Please refer to my comments below.
>
> On 11/27/2015 8:19 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>> Hi Milo,
>>
>> Thanks for the update. I have few comments below.
>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-lm3633.c b/drivers/leds/leds-lm3633.c
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..9c391ca
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-lm3633.c
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,840 @@
>>> +/*
>>> + * TI LM3633 LED driver
>>> + *
>>> + * Copyright 2015 Texas Instruments
>>> + *
>>> + * Author: Milo Kim <milo.kim@...com>
>>> + *
>>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
>>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>>> +#include <linux/leds.h>
>>> +#include <linux/mfd/ti-lmu.h>
>>> +#include <linux/mfd/ti-lmu-register.h>
>>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>>> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
>>> +#include <linux/notifier.h>
>>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>>> +
>>> +#define LM3633_MAX_PWM 255
>>> +#define LM3633_MIN_CURRENT 5000
>>> +#define LM3633_MAX_CURRENT 30000
>>> +#define LM3633_MAX_PERIOD 9700
>>> +#define LM3633_SHORT_TIMESTEP 16
>>> +#define LM3633_LONG_TIMESTEP 131
>>> +#define LM3633_TIME_OFFSET 61
>>> +#define LM3633_PATTERN_REG_OFFSET 16
>>> +#define LM3633_IMAX_OFFSET 6
>>> +
>>> +enum lm3633_led_bank_id {
>>> + LM3633_LED_BANK_C,
>>> + LM3633_LED_BANK_D,
>>> + LM3633_LED_BANK_E,
>>> + LM3633_LED_BANK_F,
>>> + LM3633_LED_BANK_G,
>>> + LM3633_LED_BANK_H,
>>> + LM3633_MAX_LEDS,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * struct ti_lmu_led_chip
>>> + *
>>> + * @dev: Parent device pointer
>>> + * @lmu: LMU structure. Used for register R/W access.
>>> + * @lock: Secure handling for multiple user interface access
>>> + * @lmu_led: Multiple LED strings
>>
>> Could you clarify what "string" means here?
>>
>>> + * @num_leds: Number of LED strings
>>
>> and here?
>
> Oops! I forgot to replace this term with 'output channel'. Thanks for
> catching this.
>
>>> +static u8 lm3633_convert_time_to_index(unsigned int msec)
>>> +{
>>> + u8 idx, offset;
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Find an approximate index
>>
>> I think that we shouldn't approximate but clamp the msec
>> to the nearest possible device setting.
>>
>>> + *
>>> + * 0 <= time <= 1000 : 16ms step
>>> + * 1000 < time <= 9700 : 131ms step, base index is 61
>>> + */
>>> +
>>> + msec = min_t(int, msec, LM3633_MAX_PERIOD);
>>> +
>>> + if (msec <= 1000) {
>>> + idx = msec / LM3633_SHORT_TIMESTEP;
>>> + if (idx > 1)
>>> + idx--;
>>> + offset = 0;
>>> + } else {
>>> + idx = (msec - 1000) / LM3633_LONG_TIMESTEP;
>>> + offset = LM3633_TIME_OFFSET;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return idx + offset;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static u8 lm3633_convert_ramp_to_index(unsigned int msec)
>>> +{
>>> + const int ramp_table[] = { 2, 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000, 8000,
>>> 16000 };
>>> + int size = ARRAY_SIZE(ramp_table);
>>> + int i;
>>> +
>>> + if (msec <= ramp_table[0])
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> + if (msec > ramp_table[size - 1])
>>> + return size - 1;
>>> +
>>> + for (i = 1; i < size; i++) {
>>> + if (msec == ramp_table[i])
>>> + return i;
>>> +
>>> + /* Find an approximate index by looking up the table */
>>
>> Similarly here. So you should have an array of the possible msec
>> values and iterate through it to look for the nearest one.
>
> Driver uses 'ramp_table[]' for this purpose. Could you describe it in
> more details?
Right, but why the values don't match the ones from the documentation?
e.g.: 2, 262, 524, 1049, 2097 etc.
And regarding sysfs attributes - they should be readable and return
the aligned value.
>>> +
>>> +static int lm3633_led_brightness_set(struct led_classdev *cdev,
>>> + enum led_brightness brightness)
>>> +{
>>> + struct ti_lmu_led *lmu_led = container_of(cdev, struct ti_lmu_led,
>>> + cdev);
>>> + struct ti_lmu_led_chip *chip = lmu_led->chip;
>>> + struct regmap *regmap = chip->lmu->regmap;
>>> + u8 reg = LM3633_REG_BRT_LVLED_BASE + lmu_led->bank_id;
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + mutex_lock(&chip->lock);
>>> +
>>> + ret = regmap_write(regmap, reg, brightness);
>>> + if (ret) {
>>> + mutex_unlock(&chip->lock);
>>> + return ret;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (brightness == 0)
>>> + lm3633_led_disable_bank(lmu_led);
>>
>> This should be checked at first, as I suppose that disabling
>> a bank suffices to turn the LED off.
>
> Well, it's not a big deal when turn off the LED. However, our silicon
> designer recommended brightness update should be done prior to enabling
> LED bank. Let me share some block diagram.
>
> [I2C logic] - [brightness control] - [control bank] - [output channel]
>
> If control bank is enabled first, then previous brightness value in
> register can be used instead of new updated brightness. So brightness
> update should be done first.
So, call "regmap_write(regmap, reg, brightness)" only if brightness > 0.
How about below (error handling skipped):
if (brightness > 0) {
regmap_write(regmap, reg, brightness);
lm3633_led_enable_bank(lmu_led);
} else {
lm3633_led_disable_bank(lmu_led);
}
>
>>> +static u8 lm3633_led_scale_max_brightness(struct ti_lmu_led
>>> *lmu_led, u32 imax)
>>> +{
>>> + u8 max_current = lm3633_led_convert_current_to_index(imax);
>>> + const u8 max_brightness_table[] = {
>>> + [LMU_IMAX_5mA] = 191,
>>> + [LMU_IMAX_6mA] = 197,
>>> + [LMU_IMAX_7mA] = 203,
>>> + [LMU_IMAX_8mA] = 208,
>>> + [LMU_IMAX_9mA] = 212,
>>> + [LMU_IMAX_10mA] = 216,
>>> + [LMU_IMAX_11mA] = 219,
>>> + [LMU_IMAX_12mA] = 222,
>>> + [LMU_IMAX_13mA] = 225,
>>> + [LMU_IMAX_14mA] = 228,
>>> + [LMU_IMAX_15mA] = 230,
>>> + [LMU_IMAX_16mA] = 233,
>>> + [LMU_IMAX_17mA] = 235,
>>> + [LMU_IMAX_18mA] = 237,
>>> + [LMU_IMAX_19mA] = 239,
>>> + [LMU_IMAX_20mA] = 241,
>>> + [LMU_IMAX_21mA] = 242,
>>> + [LMU_IMAX_22mA] = 244,
>>> + [LMU_IMAX_23mA] = 246,
>>> + [LMU_IMAX_24mA] = 247,
>>> + [LMU_IMAX_25mA] = 249,
>>> + [LMU_IMAX_26mA] = 250,
>>> + [LMU_IMAX_27mA] = 251,
>>> + [LMU_IMAX_28mA] = 253,
>>> + [LMU_IMAX_29mA] = 254,
>>> + [LMU_IMAX_30mA] = 255,
>>> + };
>>
>> After analyzing the subject one more time I think that we need to
>> change the approach regarding max brightness issue.
>>
>> At first - we shouldn't fix max current to max possible register value.
>> Instead we should take led-max-microamp property and write its value
>> to the [0x22 + bank offset] registers.
>>
>> With this approach whole 0-255 range of brightness levels will be
>> valid for the driver.
>>
>> In effect all LMU_IMAX* enums seem to be not needed.
>
> Good to hear that, it's the most simplest work for the device ;)
> Let me update the driver. Thanks!
>
> Best regards,
> Milo
>
>
--
Best Regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists