[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151130125005.GC15542@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 14:50:05 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
Cc: martin.wilck@...fujitsu.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] base/platform: fix panic when probe
function is NULL
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 03:52:51PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 06:40:03PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > I have some patches to do this that are part of my OF enablement
> > > series, but I can make something simpler that would deal with this
> > > fairly quickly if you can test.
> >
> > Does the patch set that you sent include the fix or not? I haven't yet
> > reviewed them properly.
>
> No fixing probe is another task. I can send some patches for that when
> we are done with the IRQ stuff. That is something we should fix no
> matter what..
>
> BTW, please test my IRQ series, I forgot to mention I was unable to
> test it properly here...
Got you. I need to at least test insmod/rmod (maybe couple of times in a
cycle). Do you see any other code paths that could easily break because
of your patches?
> Jason
/Jarkko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists