linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/12] Ext4: Fix extended timestamp encoding and decoding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <565C612E.70804@elstel.org>
Date:	Mon, 30 Nov 2015 15:46:06 +0100
From:	Elmar Stellnberger <estellnb@...tel.org>
To:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, linux-afs@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
	samba-technical@...ts.samba.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
	Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] Ext4: Fix extended timestamp encoding and decoding

On 30.11.2015 15:16, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 10:30:39PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> The other large missing piece is the system call implementation. I have
>> posted a series earlier this year before my parental leave, and it's
>> currently lacking review from libc folks, and blocked on me to update
>> the series and post it again.
>
> I assume that this also means there hasn't been much thought about
> userspace support above libc?  i.e., how to take a 64-bit time64_t (or
> changing the size of time_t) and translating that to a string using
> some kind of version of ctime() and asctime(), and how to parse a
> post-2038 date string and turning it into a 64-bit time_t on a 32-bit
> platform?
>

   Arnd, I would just like to tell you how much I welcome your decision 
for a new __kernel_time64_t!
   As a time[64]_t is basically well defined counting artificial seconds 
since the epoch (1970-01-01 00:00) where every year divisible by four is 
a leap year that is for the meanwhile already sufficient to make use of 
your new type. I just think about the Mayan calendar application which I 
have implemented last year (Though I have not brought it to a 
publishable state yet). A single typedef should be sufficient to let it 
make use of time64_t (it directly uses this type as well as long long 
internally for its calculations rather than the glibc time format 
functions).

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/