linux-kernel - [PATCHv3] x86: mm: clean up probe_memory_block

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:47:43 -0600
From:	Seth Jennings <sjennings@...iantweb.net>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Seth Jennings <sjennings@...iantweb.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
	Daniel J Blueman <daniel@...ascale.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCHv3] x86: mm: clean up probe_memory_block_size()

v2: remove bz local var, remove unneeded block size message (Ingo)
v3: restore bz local var, unify block size message (Ingo)

The cumulative effect of bdee237c and 982792c7 is some pretty convoluted
code.  This commit has no (intended) functional change; just seeks to
simplify and make the code more understandable.

The whole section with the "tail size" doesn't seem to be reachable,
since both the >= 64GB and < 64GB case return, so it was removed.

This commit also adds code back for the UV case since it seemed to just
go away without reason in bdee237c and might lead to unexpected change
in behavior.

Signed-off-by: Seth Jennings <sjennings@...iantweb.net>
---
 arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 24 ++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
index ec081fe..31c41c5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@
 #include <asm/numa.h>
 #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
 #include <asm/init.h>
+#include <asm/uv/uv.h>
 #include <asm/setup.h>
 
 #include "mm_internal.h"
@@ -1194,26 +1195,13 @@ int kern_addr_valid(unsigned long addr)
 
 static unsigned long probe_memory_block_size(void)
 {
-	/* start from 2g */
-	unsigned long bz = 1UL<<31;
+	unsigned long bz = MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE;
 
-	if (totalram_pages >= (64ULL << (30 - PAGE_SHIFT))) {
-		pr_info("Using 2GB memory block size for large-memory system\n");
-		return 2UL * 1024 * 1024 * 1024;
-	}
-
-	/* less than 64g installed */
-	if ((max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) < (16UL << 32))
-		return MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE;
-
-	/* get the tail size */
-	while (bz > MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE) {
-		if (!((max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) & (bz - 1)))
-			break;
-		bz >>= 1;
-	}
+	/* if system is UV or has 64GB of RAM or more, use large blocks */
+	if (is_uv_system() || ((max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) >= (64UL << 30)))
+		bz = 2UL << 30; /* 2GB */
 
-	printk(KERN_DEBUG "memory block size : %ldMB\n", bz >> 20);
+	pr_info("x86/mm: Memory block size: %ldMB\n", bz >> 20);
 
 	return bz;
 }
-- 
2.5.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/