linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] atomic: Export fetch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <565C92AA.4060109@ezchip.com>
Date:	Mon, 30 Nov 2015 13:17:14 -0500
From:	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] atomic: Export fetch_or()

(Resending as plain text.  Not sure what Thunderbird was smoking to make
this message multipart/alternative originally...)

On 11/30/2015 12:36 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 04:48:35PM -0500, Chris Metcalf wrote:
>> >Unless you want to take a big diversion into atomics, I'd be tempted
>> >to leave Peter's macro alone and just write it off as necessary evil
>> >to handle the fact that thread_info.flags is all kinds of different sizes
>> >and types on different platforms, and definitely never an atomic_t.
>> >Instead just create an inline function atomic_return_or(), or
>> >whatever name you prefer, that operates on an atomic_t, and use
>> >the atomic_t type for your structure field.  It's clearly a win to mark
>> >the data types as being atomic to the extent we can do so, I think.
> I agree that cmpxchg, test_and_set_bit, fetch_or... functions with loose
> namespaces aren't the best layout.
>
> But casting thread_info to atomic_t really worries me, I'm not sure the ending
> result would be correct at all. I prefer to sacrify correctness over namespace
> sanity:-)

Just to clear, I wasn't suggesting that that necessarily was the way for you to go.
The last four lines of my message quoted above are what I think might be the
best way forward, and don't involve messing with thread_info at all.

-- 
Chris Metcalf, EZChip Semiconductor
http://www.ezchip.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/