linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] thermal: setup monitor only once after handling trips

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151130191041.GB5900@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Mon, 30 Nov 2015 11:10:42 -0800
From:	Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
To:	"Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
Cc:	"Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] thermal: setup monitor only once after handling trips

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 07:16:08AM +0000, Chen, Yu C wrote:
> Hi,
> On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 20:07 -0800, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> > Instead of changing the monitoring setup every time after
> > handling each trip, this patch simplifies the monitoring
> > setup by moving the setup call to a place where all
> > trips have been treated already.
> > 
> > Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
> > Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 11 ++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> > index d9e525c..6debb54 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> > @@ -457,11 +457,6 @@ static void handle_thermal_trip(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int trip)
> >  		handle_critical_trips(tz, trip, type);
> >  	else
> >  		handle_non_critical_trips(tz, trip, type);
> > -	/*
> > -	 * Alright, we handled this trip successfully.
> > -	 * So, start monitoring again.
> > -	 */
> > -	monitor_thermal_zone(tz);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > @@ -547,6 +542,12 @@ void thermal_zone_device_update(struct thermal_zone_device *tz)
> >  
> >  	for (count = 0; count < tz->trips; count++)
> >  		handle_thermal_trip(tz, count);
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Alright, we handled this trip successfully.
> s/these trips ?

Yeah, I can amend this.

> > +	 * So, start monitoring again.
> > +	 */
> > +	monitor_thermal_zone(tz);
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(thermal_zone_device_update);
> >  
> BTW, thermal_notify_framework might need be affected? 

Well, the original code does not call thermal_notify_framework. Calling
it would require a different patch. This one is just to simplify the
monitoring setup.

BR,

> 
> thanks,
> Yu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/