[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151130204617.GB7648@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 14:46:18 -0600
From: Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@...onical.com>
To: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
Cc: live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jpoimboe@...hat.com, jikos@...nel.org, pmladek@...e.com,
jeyu@...hat.com, Seth Jennings <sjenning@...hat.com>,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3 v8] livepatch: add sympos as disambiguator field to
klp_reloc
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 10:52:23AM +0100, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, Chris J Arges wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > @@ -272,6 +233,7 @@ static int klp_write_object_relocations(struct module *pmod,
> > struct klp_object *obj)
> > {
> > int ret;
> > + unsigned long val;
> > struct klp_reloc *reloc;
> >
> > if (WARN_ON(!klp_is_object_loaded(obj)))
> > @@ -281,29 +243,26 @@ static int klp_write_object_relocations(struct module *pmod,
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > for (reloc = obj->relocs; reloc->name; reloc++) {
> > - if (!klp_is_module(obj)) {
> > - ret = klp_verify_vmlinux_symbol(reloc->name,
> > - reloc->val);
> > - if (ret)
> > - return ret;
> > - } else {
> > - /* module, reloc->val needs to be discovered */
> > - if (reloc->external)
> > - ret = klp_find_external_symbol(pmod,
> > - reloc->name,
> > - &reloc->val);
> > - else
> > - ret = klp_find_object_symbol(obj->mod->name,
> > - reloc->name,
> > - 0, &reloc->val);
> > - if (ret)
> > - return ret;
> > - }
> > + /* discover the address of the referenced symbol */
> > + if (reloc->external) {
> > + if (reloc->sympos > 0) {
> > + pr_err("non-zero sympos for external reloc symbol '%s' is not supported\n",
> > + reloc->name);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + ret = klp_find_external_symbol(pmod, reloc->name, &val);
> > + } else
> > + ret = klp_find_object_symbol(obj->mod->name,
> > + reloc->name,
> > + reloc->sympos,
> > + &val);
>
> I think this will cause an unwanted effect if a relocation is for vmlinux
> symbol. obj->mod is NULL in that case. So obj->name should be there. Can
> you test it with kpatch, Chris, please? If that is possible.
>
> Thanks,
> Miroslav
>
Yes I need to fix this, an option would be to use:
ret = klp_find_object_symbol(obj->name ? obj->name : obj->mod->name,
reloc->name, 0, &reloc->val);
Testing with kpatch will require some modifications as the structures are
different.
--chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists