| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 16:50:07 -0500
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...tuozzo.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] mm: memcontrol: generalize the socket accounting
jump label
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 04:08:18PM -0500, Jason Baron wrote:
> We're trying to move to the updated API, so this should be:
> static_branch_unlikely(&memcg_sockets_enabled_key)
>
> see: include/linux/jump_label.h for details.
Good point. There is another struct static_key in there as well. How
about the following on top of this series?
---
>From b784aa0323628d43272e13a67ead2a2ce0e93ea6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 16:41:38 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: switch to the updated jump-label API
According to <linux/jump_label.h> the direct use of struct static_key
is deprecated. Update the socket and slab accounting code accordingly.
Reported-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
---
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 8 ++++----
mm/memcontrol.c | 12 ++++++------
net/ipv4/tcp_memcontrol.c | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index a8df46c..9a19590 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -704,8 +704,8 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_wb_stats(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
#ifdef CONFIG_INET
struct sock;
-extern struct static_key memcg_sockets_enabled_key;
-#define mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled static_key_false(&memcg_sockets_enabled_key)
+extern struct static_key_false memcg_sockets_enabled_key;
+#define mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled static_branch_unlikely(&memcg_sockets_enabled_key)
void sock_update_memcg(struct sock *sk);
void sock_release_memcg(struct sock *sk);
bool mem_cgroup_charge_skmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages);
@@ -727,7 +727,7 @@ static inline bool mem_cgroup_under_socket_pressure(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
#endif /* CONFIG_INET */
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
-extern struct static_key memcg_kmem_enabled_key;
+extern struct static_key_false memcg_kmem_enabled_key;
extern int memcg_nr_cache_ids;
void memcg_get_cache_ids(void);
@@ -743,7 +743,7 @@ void memcg_put_cache_ids(void);
static inline bool memcg_kmem_enabled(void)
{
- return static_key_false(&memcg_kmem_enabled_key);
+ return static_branch_unlikely(&memcg_kmem_enabled_key);
}
static inline bool memcg_kmem_is_active(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index a0da91f..5fe45d68 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ void memcg_put_cache_ids(void)
* conditional to this static branch, we'll have to allow modules that does
* kmem_cache_alloc and the such to see this symbol as well
*/
-struct static_key memcg_kmem_enabled_key;
+DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(memcg_kmem_enabled_key);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(memcg_kmem_enabled_key);
#endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM */
@@ -2883,7 +2883,7 @@ static int memcg_activate_kmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
err = page_counter_limit(&memcg->kmem, nr_pages);
VM_BUG_ON(err);
- static_key_slow_inc(&memcg_kmem_enabled_key);
+ static_branch_inc(&memcg_kmem_enabled_key);
/*
* A memory cgroup is considered kmem-active as soon as it gets
* kmemcg_id. Setting the id after enabling static branching will
@@ -3622,7 +3622,7 @@ static void memcg_destroy_kmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
if (memcg->kmem_acct_activated) {
memcg_destroy_kmem_caches(memcg);
- static_key_slow_dec(&memcg_kmem_enabled_key);
+ static_branch_dec(&memcg_kmem_enabled_key);
WARN_ON(page_counter_read(&memcg->kmem));
}
tcp_destroy_cgroup(memcg);
@@ -4258,7 +4258,7 @@ mem_cgroup_css_online(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
#ifdef CONFIG_INET
if (cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys) && !cgroup_memory_nosocket)
- static_key_slow_inc(&memcg_sockets_enabled_key);
+ static_branch_inc(&memcg_sockets_enabled_key);
#endif
/*
@@ -4302,7 +4302,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_css_free(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
memcg_destroy_kmem(memcg);
#ifdef CONFIG_INET
if (cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys) && !cgroup_memory_nosocket)
- static_key_slow_dec(&memcg_sockets_enabled_key);
+ static_branch_dec(&memcg_sockets_enabled_key);
#endif
__mem_cgroup_free(memcg);
}
@@ -5494,7 +5494,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_replace_page(struct page *oldpage, struct page *newpage)
#ifdef CONFIG_INET
-struct static_key memcg_sockets_enabled_key;
+DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(memcg_sockets_enabled_key);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(memcg_sockets_enabled_key);
void sock_update_memcg(struct sock *sk)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_memcontrol.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_memcontrol.c
index 9a22e2d..18bc7f7 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_memcontrol.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_memcontrol.c
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ void tcp_destroy_cgroup(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
return;
if (memcg->tcp_mem.active)
- static_key_slow_dec(&memcg_sockets_enabled_key);
+ static_branch_dec(&memcg_sockets_enabled_key);
}
static int tcp_update_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned long nr_pages)
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static int tcp_update_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned long nr_pages)
* because when this value change, the code to process it is not
* patched in yet.
*/
- static_key_slow_inc(&memcg_sockets_enabled_key);
+ static_branch_inc(&memcg_sockets_enabled_key);
memcg->tcp_mem.active = true;
}
--
2.6.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists