lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20151201003113.D800C1E0@viggo.jf.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 30 Nov 2015 16:31:13 -0800
From:	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
	dan.carpenter@...cle.com, stable@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH] x86, mpx: fix instruction decoder condition


From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>

MPX decodes instructions in order to tell which bounds register
was violated.  Part of this decoding involves looking at the "REX
prefix" which is a special instrucion prefix used to retrofit
support for new registers in to old instructions.

The X86_REX_*() macros are defined to return actual bit values:

	#define X86_REX_R(rex) ((rex) & 4)

*not* boolean values.  However, the MPX code was checking for
them like they were booleans.  This might have led to us
mis-decoding the "REX prefix" and giving false information out to
userspace about bounds violations.  X86_REX_B() actually is bit 1,
so this is really only broken for the X86_REX_X() case.

Fix the conditionals up to tolerate the non-boolean values.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: x86@...nel.org
---

 b/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff -puN arch/x86/mm/mpx.c~mpx-rex arch/x86/mm/mpx.c
--- a/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c~mpx-rex	2015-11-30 15:33:32.393469377 -0800
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c	2015-11-30 16:12:14.805379908 -0800
@@ -101,19 +101,19 @@ static int get_reg_offset(struct insn *i
 	switch (type) {
 	case REG_TYPE_RM:
 		regno = X86_MODRM_RM(insn->modrm.value);
-		if (X86_REX_B(insn->rex_prefix.value) == 1)
+		if (X86_REX_B(insn->rex_prefix.value))
 			regno += 8;
 		break;
 
 	case REG_TYPE_INDEX:
 		regno = X86_SIB_INDEX(insn->sib.value);
-		if (X86_REX_X(insn->rex_prefix.value) == 1)
+		if (X86_REX_X(insn->rex_prefix.value))
 			regno += 8;
 		break;
 
 	case REG_TYPE_BASE:
 		regno = X86_SIB_BASE(insn->sib.value);
-		if (X86_REX_B(insn->rex_prefix.value) == 1)
+		if (X86_REX_B(insn->rex_prefix.value))
 			regno += 8;
 		break;
 
_
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ