linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: pxa: make more mach/*.h files local

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 01 Dec 2015 08:22:34 +0100
From:	Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: pxa: make more mach/*.h files local

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> writes:

> Lots of header files are never included outside of a mach-pxa
> directory and do not need to be made visible in include/mach,
> so let's just move them all down one level.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
> I've been carrying patches like this one in my multiplatform series
> for a while, the PXA one is the largest.
>
> I'd like to merge that for 4.5, any objections?
No, I like this very much.
Acked-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>

> Do you want to take it into a PXA branch to avoid conflicts, or should
> I put it into arm-soc directly?
I don't have any patch so far queued for v4.5, so please take it, I think I'll
skip v4.5 pull.

Cheers.

--
Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/