[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <565D5F4F.8020807@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 09:50:23 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Li Bin <huawei.libin@...wei.com>
Cc: sjenning@...hat.com, jikos@...nel.org, vojtech@...e.com,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
guohanjun@...wei.com, dingtianhong@...wei.com, xiexiuqi@...wei.com,
zhouchengming1@...wei.com, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] livepatch: fix race between enabled_store() and
klp_unregister_patch()
On 12/01/2015, 02:11 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> When I try to recreate something similar by putting a delay in
> enabled_store(), klp_free_patch() just sleeps on its call to
> kobject_put() until enabled_store() returns. The unregister stack looks
> like:
>
> [<ffffffff812e966b>] __kernfs_remove+0x1fb/0x380
> [<ffffffff812ea273>] kernfs_remove+0x23/0x40
> [<ffffffff812ec601>] sysfs_remove_dir+0x51/0x80
> [<ffffffff81407fb8>] kobject_del+0x18/0x50
> [<ffffffff8140804a>] kobject_release+0x5a/0x190
> [<ffffffff81407f27>] kobject_put+0x27/0x50
What about _put outside of klp_mutex in klp_unregister_patch (and maybe
the other _put's as well)? Plus Li Bin's patch.
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists